Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCustodio, Nilton
dc.contributor.authorMontesinos, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorAlva-Diaz, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorPacheco-Barrios, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Calienes, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorHerrera-Pérez, Eder
dc.contributor.authorBecerra-Becerra, Yahaira
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Suárez, Sheila
dc.contributor.authorPintado-Caipa, Maritza
dc.contributor.authorCruz del Castillo, Rossana
dc.contributor.authorCuenca, José
dc.contributor.authorLira, David
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T07:18:21Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T07:18:21Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-08
dc.identifier.citationCustodio, N., ...[et al.]. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of brief cognitive screening tools to diagnose vascular cognitive impairment in Peru. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 37. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5531es_PE
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11537/28470
dc.descriptionEl texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPN por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado.es_PE
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Introduction To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of three brief cognitive screening (BCS) tools, Peruvian version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-Pe), of INECO Frontal Screening (IFS-Pe) and of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-Pe), for the diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and its non-dementia stages (VCI-ND) and vascular dementia (VD) in patients with cerebral stroke in Lima—Peru. Materials and methods A cohort analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of three BCS for VCI. Results Two hundred and four patients were evaluated: 61% Non-VCI, 30% VCI-ND and 9% VD. To discriminate patients with VCI from controls, the area under the curve (AUC) of ACE-Pe, IFS-Pe and MMs-Pe were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98–0.99), 0.99 (95%CI 0.98–0.99) and 0.87 (95%CI 0.82–0.92), respectively. Of the three BCS, the IFS-Pe presented a larger AUC to discriminate VCI-ND from VD (AUC = 0.98 [95%CI 0.95–1]) compared to ACE-Pe (AUC = 0.84 [95%CI 0.74–0.95]) and MMSE-Pe (0.92 [95%CI 0.86–0.99]). The IFS-Pe presented a higher sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive (+LR) and negative likelihood ratios (−LR) (S = 96.72%, Sp = 89.47%, +LR = 9.1 and −LR = 0.03) than ACE-Pe (S = 96.72%, Sp = 63.16%, +LR = 2.62 and −LR = 0.05) and MMSE-Pe (S = 90.16%, Sp = 78.95%, +LR = 4.28 and −LR = 0.12). In the multiple regression analysis, the IFS-Pe was not affected by age, sex or years of schooling. Conclusion The IFS-Pe has the best diagnostic accuracy for detecting VCI and discriminating between pre-dementia (VCI-ND) and dementia (VD) stages.es_PE
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_PE
dc.language.isoenges_PE
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonses_PE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_PE
dc.sourceUniversidad Privada del Nortees_PE
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - UPNes_PE
dc.subjectPruebas psicológicases_PE
dc.subjectSalud mentales_PE
dc.subjectDemenciaes_PE
dc.titleDiagnostic accuracy of brief cognitive screening tools to diagnose vascular cognitive impairment in Perues_PE
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_PE
dc.publisher.countryUSes_PE
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatryes_PE
dc.description.peer-reviewRevisión por pareses_PE
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.01.02es_PE
dc.description.sedeSan Juan de Luriganchoes_PE
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5531


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record