Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorHerrera Añazco, Percy
dc.contributor.authorUrrunaga Pastor, Diego
dc.contributor.authorSoto Ordoñez, Suly
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorLópez Dávila, Luis Manuel
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Del Carpio Toia, Agueda
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T23:42:52Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T23:42:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-28
dc.identifier.citationHerrera, P., Urrunaga, D., Soto, S., Torres, F., López, L. M., & Muñoz, A. (2023). Results and Feasibility of the Virtual Inspection of Clinical Trials During Pandemic of COVID-19 in Peru. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, 57(4), 678-688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00503-7es_PE
dc.identifier.other.es_PE
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11537/34676
dc.description.abstractObjective This study aimed to describe the results of inspection of clinical trials (CTs) and the feasibility of conducting inspections virtually in Peruvian Social Security hospitals during the pandemic of COVID-19. Methods This study described 25 CTs that were inspected during August 2021–November 2021. The data for the variables were obtained from the CT inspection database of the Social Security Sub-directorate of Regulation and Management of Health Research which includes minutes and inspection reports. We describe the characteristics of the CT included and fndings during the inspections using relative and absolute frequencies. Likewise, we evaluated the feasibility of virtual inspection through a self-administered questionnaire. Results According to the fndings of the inspection, 60% of CTs were on biological products, and 60% were focused on infectiology. Additionally, 64% of CTs were implemented in Lima, 52% were conducted in level IV health facilities, and 72% were funded by the pharmaceutical sector. The lack of submission of requested documents (16/25) and inadequate access to the internet (9/15) and source documents (4/15) were the primary observations during the inspection. Regarding the feasibility of virtual supervisions, most interviewees rated their understanding of instruction form as “normal” and its content as “adequate.” Similarly, in the virtual self-assessment matrix, a large proportion of interviewees rated comprehension as “normal” (7/15) and its content as “adequate” (13/15). The quality of the virtual supervision process was 8.6±1.1 on a scale of 1–10. Conclusion Discrepancies in records and failure to submit requested documents were the main observations. Moes_PE
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_PE
dc.language.isospaes_PE
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbHes_PE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_PE
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.sourceUniversidad Privada del Nortees_PE
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - UPNes_PE
dc.subjectPandemiaes_PE
dc.subjectCOVID-19es_PE
dc.subjectSeguridad sociales_PE
dc.titleResults and Feasibility of the Virtual Inspection of Clinical Trials During Pandemic of COVID-19 in Perues_PE
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_PE
dc.publisher.countryPEes_PE
dc.identifier.journalTherapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Sciencees_PE
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.01.00es_PE
dc.description.sedeBreñaes_PE
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00503-7


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess